🌌 Is 2 Tank Vs Tiger

It has trollier armor than Tiger, especially against American 76mm players, who can't aim. The 122mm cannon while does have awfully long reload, performs at least somewhat decent in uptiers. Sure you can't bum rush everywhere like on T-34-85, but IS-2 is an excellent tank destroyer, and great in corner peeking, thanks to the fast reverse speed. The armour of the IS-2 (1944) (China) is fitting for a heavy tank, with enough thickness to ward off most incoming shots. However, there are lots of weak points present that enemy guns can readily penetrate, namely the lower glacis and the turret front, the latter which presents only 100 mm of armour if the incoming shell hits at a 0 degree impact angle. Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019) by Art » 10 Jul 2019, 08:51. German evaluation from July 1944 stated that in terms of armor protection and penetration Tiger I with KwK 36 was inferior to IS 122 whereas Tiger II was far superior. Which was, however, based on theoretical penetration tables rather than actual trials. It was based on KV-1 heavy tank and was armed 152mm howitzer.It was nicknamed Zveroboi (Animal Killer). At the end of 1943, a new assault gun, the ISU-152, based on IS-2 heavy tank was produced. It was armed with a very powerful 152mm howitzer. The shell of this gun could penetrate any part of the Tiger’s armor and even cut the turret from Shermans were simple but highly reliable tank in terms of manufacturing and repairing furthermore they were easy to use. For instance, they could move comfortably on most surfaces where Tigers will either fail or require special attention like building special bridges and so on. Moreover Shermans are highly simplified tanking solution when The German Tiger tank of Second World War fame is a machine wrapped in a mythos far stronger and less brittle than the 100mm front armor plating the tank drove into battle wearing. As a result of World of tanks - comparing tanks side by side: IS-2 vs. Tiger (P) Soviet IS-2 tanks were exported to China in the early 1950s and were used during the Korean War from 1950 through 1953. But it didn't penetrate the twenty-centimetre-thick armour skin." [1] The Leman Russ was able to take the punishment of a 105mm cannon, in the 41st Millennium, while sustaining lasgun fire that would melt the armour of Tiger Tanks under sustained fire. The Pzkfw VI Tiger I is only armed with a Tungsten core kwk. 88mm cannon. Leopard 2 tanks are seen as a vital, modern military vehicle that would bolster Kyiv’s forces as the war with Russia approaches the one-year mark. But Germany has batted back claims it is Join & Support The Channel: Comparing: KV-1S vs. Tiger I. A further modification of the KV-1 heavy tank series developed in the summer of 1942. It passed into Red Army service on August 20, 1942. Compared to its predecessors, KV-1S had several design features which allowed for the tank’s weight to be reduced to 42.3 tons. Also, the KV-1S had increased top speed .

is 2 tank vs tiger